Skip to content

8380565: PPC64: deoptimization stub should save vector registers#431

Open
TheRealMDoerr wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
TheRealMDoerr:8380565_PPC64_deopt_VectorRegisters
Open

8380565: PPC64: deoptimization stub should save vector registers#431
TheRealMDoerr wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
TheRealMDoerr:8380565_PPC64_deopt_VectorRegisters

Conversation

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Mar 30, 2026 •
edited by openjdk bot
Loading

Clean backport of JDK-8380565 + testfix JDK-8381315.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8380565 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8381315 needs maintainer approval

Issues

  • JDK-8380565: PPC64: deoptimization stub should save vector registers (Bug - P3)
  • JDK-8381315: compiler/vectorapi/TestVectorReallocation.java fails with -XX:UseAVX=1 after JDK-8380565 (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/431/head:pull/431
$ git checkout pull/431

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/431
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/431/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 431

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 431

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/431.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 30, 2026

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2026

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 29e1ee2eccd59e665827e0d42c490261002cf99e 8380565: PPC64: deoptimization stub should save vector registers Mar 30, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2026

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Mar 30, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2026

⚠️ @TheRealMDoerr This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 30, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mlbridge bot commented Mar 30, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Webrevs

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

TheRealMDoerr commented Mar 31, 2026

/issue add JDK-8381315

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required label Mar 31, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk bot commented Mar 31, 2026

@TheRealMDoerr
Adding additional issue to issue list: 8381315: compiler/vectorapi/TestVectorReallocation.java fails with -XX:UseAVX=1 after JDK-8380565.

reinrich
reinrich approved these changes Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@reinrich reinrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Cheers, Richard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@reinrich reinrich reinrich approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TheRealMDoerr @reinrich